Refine your search
Collections
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Pandya, Falguni H.
- An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Restructuring and Share Price Performance in India
Abstract Views :401 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, G H Patel Post Graduate Institute of Business Management, Sardar Patel University, Valabh Vidyanagar Anand (Gujarat)
2 Faculty, Centre for Management Studies, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad (Gujarat)
1 Associate Professor, G H Patel Post Graduate Institute of Business Management, Sardar Patel University, Valabh Vidyanagar Anand (Gujarat)
2 Faculty, Centre for Management Studies, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad (Gujarat)
Source
International Journal of Financial Management, Vol 1, No 3 (2011), Pagination: 33-48Abstract
This paper presents an empirical study of the effect of mergers and acquisitions on the return of shares of acquirer and target fi rm. For this research, we have taken all listed companies of BSE for which merger and acquisition has taken place between 2000 and 2010. Total 80 samples are taken, among this 40 are of mergers involving 20 of acquirer and 20 of target fi rms, and 40 of acquisition involving 20 of acquirer and 20 of target fi rms. A comparative analysis of abnormal gains of target fi rms involved in M&A reveals that the abnormal gains of target fi rms of acquisition was higher than target fi rms of merger. In the context of news leakage of information, it can be suggested that the investment strategies involving buying shares of target fi rms prior to the announcement of a merger and selling them off after the merger announcement could result in profi table opportunities.Keywords
Mergers And Acquisitions, Target Firms, Acquirer Firms, Abnormal Gains
References
- Sudarshan, sudi (2003), “Creating value from mergers and acquisitions- the challenges”. Harlow: Pearson Education ltd.
- Asquith, paul, F Bruner Robert, and W Mullims david Jr, 1983, “The gains to bidding fi rms from Merger”, Journal of fi nancial Economics, Vol 11, No 1-4,pp 121-139.
- Black.FMC Jenson and M Scholes, (1972)”Capital asset Pricing Model: Some empirical tests”, in MC Jenson, studies in the theory of capital Markets, New York: Prager, Vol 7, pp79-124.
- Mandelkar, G, (1974),”Risk and return: the case of Merging fi rms”, Journal of fi nancial Economics, Vol-4, pp 303-335
- B Rajesh kumar And S Panneerselvam , (2010), “Mergers Acquisitions and Wealth creation: A Comparative Study in the Indian Context”, IIM-B Management Review,
- Ajay Pandey, (2001), “Takeover announcements, open offers, and shareholders return in Target fi rms”, Vikalp, Vol 26, No 3.
- Vardhana Pawaskar, (2001) “Effect of mergers on corporate performance in India”, Vikalp, Vol 26, No 1.
- A K Mishra and Rashmi Goel,(2005) “Returns to shareholders from mergers: The case of RIL and RPL Merger”, IIM-B Management Review.
- K. Ramakrishnan’ Mergers & acquisitions in India, the long-term post-merger performance of fi rms and the strategic factors leading to M&A success,
- Jeff gell, Alexandar roose, (2008) “The return of the strategist creating value with M&A in downturn”, BCG Report.
- Michail Pazarskis, Manthos Vogiatzogloy,(2006) “Exploring the Improvement of Corporate Performance after Mergers – the Case of Greece”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 6.
- www.bseindia.com
- Are Stock Markets Interdependent? An Empirical Study of Selected Market Indices
Abstract Views :295 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Centre for Management Studies, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadia, Gujarat, IN
1 Centre for Management Studies, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadia, Gujarat, IN
Source
International Journal of Financial Management, Vol 6, No 3 (2016), Pagination: 57-67Abstract
It has been acclaimed by various researchers that international diversification has reduced its charm as return-risk of the world markets are highly correlated due to information spillover effect and globalisation. This study examines inter linkages and interactions, if any, among the selected twelve indices of developed and emerging economies. The study applies descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients and Granger Causality test to check basic characteristics of each indices and their correlation and impact on each other. Granger Causality test for some indices shows that return of one market index had causal influence on return in other market index. The finding of this paper gives good insights to the international investors who are looking to reduce risk for a given level of return.Keywords
Market Indices, Integration, Diversification.References
- Bhunia, A., & Das, A. (2012). Financial market integration: Empirical evidence from India and Select South Asian countries. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3(1), 1-16.
- Birau, R. F., & Trivedi, J. (2013). Analyzing cointegration and international linkage between bucharest stock exchange and European developed stock markets. International Journal of Economics and Statistics, 1(4), 237-246.
- Bodla, B. S., & Yadav, P. (2014). Interlinkages between stock returns of emerging economics: An empirical study. HSB Research Review, 8(1), 14-27.
- Daly, J. K. (2003). Southeast Asian Stock Market Linkages: Evidence from pre and post October 1997. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 20(1), 73-85.
- Durai, R., & Bhaduri, S. (2006). Correlation Dynamics in Equity Markets Evidence from India” working paper, Madras School of Economics, Gandhi Mandapam Road, Chennai, India
- Flavin, T. J., Hurley, M. J., & Fabrice, R. (2001).Explaining stock market correlation: A gravity approach. Retrieved from http://eprintsprod.nuim.ie/87/1/N1101101.pdf as on 01/05/2015
- Khalil, J. (2014). Dynamic linkages between Asian countries stock markets: Evidence from Karachi stock exchange. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 3(5), 6-13
- Kumar, B., & Singh, P. (2006). The dynamic relationship between stock returns, trading volume and volatility: Evidence from Indian stock market, NSE Working Paper.
- Lamba, A. (2003). An analysis of the dynamic relationships between South Asian and developed equity markets. NSE Working Paper 83, Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Commerce, The University of Melbourne.
- Markowitz, H. (1987). Mean variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital market.Oxford, UK, Basic Blackwell.
- Markowitz, H. (1991). Foundations of portfolio theory. The Journal of Finance, 46(2), 469-477
- Mukherjee, D. (2007). Comparative analysis of Indian stock market with international markets. Research Journal of Great Lakes Herald, 1(1), 39-71
- Mukherjee, P., & Bose, S. (2008). Does the Stock Market in India move with Asia? A Multivariate Co integration Vector-Autoregression Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 44(5), 5-22.
- Nath, G., & Verma, S. (2003). Study of Common Stochastic Trend and Co-Integration in the Emerging Markets A Case Study of India, Singapore and Taiwan”, working paper.
- Philipp, F., & Louberge, H. (2007). International stock market correlations: A sectoral approach. Retrieved from http://eprintsprod.nuim.ie/87/1/N1101101.pdf as on 01/05/2015
- Subha, M. V., & Nambi, T. S. (2010). A study on cointegration between Indian and American stock markets. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management.
- Subhani, M., Hasan, S., Meher, A., & Osman, A. (2011). Are the major South Asian equity markets co-integrated? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science,1(12), 117-121.
- Siddiqui, S. (2009). Examining Associations between S&P CNX Nifty and selected Asian & US Stock Markets”, research paper, Centre for Management Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University) Jamia Nagar, New Delhi
- Singh, S., & Sharma, G. D. (2012). Interlinkages between stock exchanges: A study of BRIC Nations. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services and Management Research, 1(3), 1-17.
- Singh, G., & Singh, P. (2011). Chinese and Indian stock market linkages with developed stock market. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(2), 21-39.
- Stiglitz, E. J. (2006). Making Globalization Work, WW Norton &Co;.
- Tahir, S., Sabir, H., Ali, Y., Ali,S. J., & Ismail, A. (2013). Interdependence of South Asian and developed stock markets and their impact on KSE (Pakistan), 3(1), 16-27.
- Yang, J., Hsiao, C., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2006). The emerging market crisis and stock market linkages: Further evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(6), 727-744.
- Yuce, A., & Mugan-Simga, C. (2000).Linkages among Eastern European Stock Markets and the Major Stock Exchanges. Russian and East European Finance and Trade, 36(6), 54-69.
- Zabiulla. (2014). Cross-Auto Correlation Structure between Size-based Portfolios: Evidence from the Indian Stock Markets. IIMS Journal of Management Science, 5(2), 176-186.
- https://www.eurofidai.org/Fasnacht.pdf
- https://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_BSESN-BSE-30-Sensitivity-Index-SENSEX-India
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_CSE-Colombo-All-Shares-Index-Sri-Lanka
- http://quotes.wsj.com/DJIA/index-historical-pric#es
- http://quotes.wsj.com/UK/UKX/index-historical-prices#
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_GDAXI-DAX-Index-Germany
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_HSI-Hang-Seng-Index-Hong-Kong
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_IBEX-IBEX-35-Index-Spain
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_JKSE-Jakarta-Composite-Index-Indonesia
- https://in.finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=^KSE&a=00&b=1&c=1990&d=08&e=20&f=2014&g=d
- http://quotes.wsj.com/JP/XTKS/NIK/index-historical-prices#
- https://www.quandl.com/NSE/SPCNXNIFTY-National-Stock-Exchange-of-India-Stock-Index-S-P-CNX-NIFTY http://www.quandl.com/PHILSE/PSE-Philippine-Stock-Index-PSEi
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_RTS_RS-RTSI-Index-Russia
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_GSPC-S-amp-P-500-Index
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_SSEC-Shanghai-Composite-Index-China
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_STI-Straits-Times-Index-Singapore
- http://www.quandl.com/YAHOO/INDEX_TWII-Taiwan-Weighted-Index
- http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=1556
- Impact of Fiscal Incentives on MSMEs’ Performance in Gujarat
Abstract Views :185 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 C U Shah University, Wadhwan city, Gujarat, IN
2 Business Management Department, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, IN
3 Finance and Economics, Centre for Management Studies, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, IN
1 C U Shah University, Wadhwan city, Gujarat, IN
2 Business Management Department, Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand, Gujarat, IN
3 Finance and Economics, Centre for Management Studies, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, IN
Source
Journal of Entrepreneurship & Management, Vol 4, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 1-20Abstract
Fiscal incentives act as an instrument to enhance growth of industry and in turn, that of economy is a debatable issue all over the world. Many countries and many governments have burnt their hands in imposing or reducing tax rates and other benefits. The impact of different fiscal incentives on various corporate decisions is not certain and varies from country to country and time to time. Sometimes it has been found that such fiscal incentives work best when it is coupled with other factors like political stability, infrastructure facilities etc. In addition, many researchers have viewed that such fiscal incentives results in to nothing but just raises the burden of the government. The present study attempts to find out how industrial sector particularly MSMEs view these incentives on their overall impact.Keywords
MSMEs, Fiscal Incentives, Impact of Fiscal Incentives.- What Makes Audience to Watch Bollywood Films in India:An Empirical Study
Abstract Views :266 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 MBA Department, Center for Management Studies Dharmsinh Desai University Nadiad, Gujarat, IN
1 MBA Department, Center for Management Studies Dharmsinh Desai University Nadiad, Gujarat, IN
Source
International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, Vol 6, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 22-34Abstract
Purpose: The present paper intends to study how to increase box-office collection by producing audience centric film.
Objectives: To investigate and examine what audience likes to see in films. Design/Methodology/Approach: The paper has used descriptive research design because it intends to investigative questions and results to discovery of association among variables. Data are collected from 1165 respondents of different age groups, education, income background, and locality through structured questionnaire-cum-interview method. A questionnaire is constructed using Likert scale and administered using convenience sampling approach. Data are analysed using the SPSS 17 software.
Research Limitations/Implications: Future research can be conducted for further improvements in measuring techniques and also by adding more volleys of questions. Even in the case of set of influences, they might well differ in other countries or at other times. In sum, all the caveat and limitations just enumerated a need for support in future investigations for using data in multiple time periods, in multiple countries, and with multiple viewers. Future researches can address the generalisability of our findings across time periods and geographical settings.
Finding: This paper adds historical and theoretical depth for debate to attitude of audience to watch Bollywood films in respect to characters, likings, and theme of films. The attitude of audience of watching Bollywood films is not an actively researched topic in India. The study therefore contributes toward better understanding to many stakeholders of films while it is being produced.
Practical Implications: The findings can provide some relevant scope for directors and marketers of Bollywood movies.
Keywords
Film, Attitude, Box-office, Audience.References
- Ainslie, A., Dreze, X., & Zurfryden, F. (2005). Modeling movie life cycles and market share. Marketing Science, 24(3), 508-517.
- Bagella, M., & Becchetti, L. (1999). The determinants of motion picture box office performance: Evidence from movies produced in Italy. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(4), 237-256.
- De Vany, A., & Walls, D. (1999). Uncertainty in the movie industry: Does star power reduce the terror of the box office? Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 285-318.
- Drake, P. (2008). Distribution and marketing in contemporary Hollywood. The Contemporary Hollywood
- Film Industry edited by Wasko, J and McDonald, (pp.63-82). Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
- Elberse, A. (2007). The power of stars: Do star actors drive the success of movies?. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 102-120.
- Eliashberg, J. A., Elberse, A., Mark, A., & Leenders, M. (2006). The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Science, 25(6), 638-661.
- Eliashberg, J., Hui, S. K., & Zhang, Z. J. (2007). From story line to box office: A new approach for greenlighting movie scripts. Journal of Management Science, 53, 881-893.
- Eliashberg, J., Weinberg, C. B., & Hui, S. K. (2008). Decision models for the movie industry. In Handbook of marketing decision models (pp. 437-468). Springer US.
- Eliashberg, J., Swami, S., Wierenga, B., & Weinberg, C. B. (2001). Implementing and evaluating Silver Screener: A marketing management support system for movie exhibitors. Interfaces, 31(3), S108-S127. May-June.
- European Audiovisual Council, Council of Europe (2009).
- Goldman, W. (1983). Adventures in the screen trade. Grand Central Publishing.
- Holbrook, M. B., & Addis, M. (2007). Taste versus the market: An extension of research on the consumption of popular culture. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(October), 415-424.
- India Entertainment and Media Outlook (2012). Annual report: Confederation of Indian Industry and PwC India.
- Krishnan, T. V., & Sakkthivel, A. M. (2010). To push for stardom or not: A rookie’s dilemma in the Tamil movie industry. IIMB Management Review, 22(3), 80-92.
- Lorenzen, M., & Taube, F. A. (2008). Breakout from bollywood? The roles of social networks and regulation in the evolution of Indian film industry. Journal of International Management, 14(3), 286-299. doi.10.1016/j.intman.2008.01.004
- McKenzie, J. (2010). The economics of movies: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10(1), 1-37.
- Nelson, R. A., & Glotfelty, R (2012). Movie stars and box office revenues: An empirical analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36(2), 141-166.
- Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. The Journal of Business, 72(4), 463-492.
- Sarkar, S., & Nayak, A. (2009). Film Merchandising in India. GMJ, 3(1), 1-10.
- Silk, A. J., & Glen, L. (1978). Urban pre-test market evaluation of new packaged goods: A model and measurement methodology. Journal of Marketing Research 15(2), 171-91.
- Sridhar, S. N., & Mattoo, N. K. (1997). Ananya: A portrait of India. New York: Associations of Indians in America.
- Srinivas, L. (2002). The active audience: Spectatorship, social relations and the experience of cinema in India. Media, Culture & Society, 24, 155-173.
- McDonnell, J. J., & Silver, J. D. (2007). Are Movie Theatres doomed? Do exhibitors see the big picture as theatres lose their competitive advantage? Business Horizons, 50(6), 491-501.
- Tirumala, L. N. (2009). Bollywood movies and identity construction amongst second generation Indian Americans. Journal of Academia education, 1-27.
- Watson, G. (2004). Uncertainty and contractual hazard in the film industry: managing adversarial collaboration with dominant suppliers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 402-409, doi: 10.1108/13598540410560784.